STRUKTUR KERAK BUMI DI JAWA TIMUR BERDASARKAN ANALISIS FUNGSI PENERIMA TELESEISMIK

Authors

  • Puji Ariyanto Sekolah Tinggi Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7309-5192
  • Maryam Sidiqa Sekolah Tinggi Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika, Indonesia
  • Bayu Pranata Pusat Gempa Bumi dan Tsunami, Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Bambang S Prayitno Pusat Gempa Bumi dan Tsunami, Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23960/jge.v7i3.168

Keywords:

Crustal structure, East Java, Moho, P and S wave velocity, Receiver function

Abstract

Jawa Timur merupakan salah satu wilayah Indonesia yang memiliki kondisi tektonik yang aktif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui struktur kerak bumi di wilayah Jawa Timur meliputi: ketebalan kerak bumi, model kecepatan gelombang P dan S. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis fungsi penerima dari gempa teleseismik dengan jarak episenter 30-90° dan magnitudo ≥ 6 yang terekam pada 6 stasiun seismik broadband milik Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika (BMKG) yang berada pada 3 zona geologi utama di Jawa Timur, yaitu: stasiun TBJI dan GRJI di Zona Rembang, Stasiun LUJI dan ABJI di Zona Kendeng, serta stasiun PWJI dan GEJI di Zona Pegunungan Selatan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ketebalan kerak pada Zona Rembang sekitar 25-28 km pada stasiun TBJI dan 23-27 km pada stasiun GRJI, dengan nilai kecepatan gelombang seismik yang relatif sedang. Pada Zona Cekungan Kendeng di bawah stasiun LUJI dan ABJI, ketebalan kerak lebih tipis yaitu 18-20 km, dengan model kecepatan gelombang seismik relatif rendah. Sedangkan pada Zona Pegunungan Selatan mempunyai ketebalan kerak lebih tebal yaitu 34-37 km di bawah stasiun PWJI dan 37-40 km di bawah stasiun GEJI, dengan kecepatan gelombang seismik lebih tinggi. Adanya penebalan dan penipisan kerak diperkirakan karena adanya efek isostasi.

Author Biography

Puji Ariyanto, Sekolah Tinggi Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika

Program Studi Geofisika
STMKG

References

Anggono, T., Syuhada, S., Febriani, F., Handayani, L., Mukti, M. M., & Amran, A. (2020). Crustal Shear-Wave Velocity Structure in Western Java, Indonesia from Analysis of Teleseismic Receiver Functions. Journal of Earth System Science, 129(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1288-1

Ariyanto, P. (2018). Struktur Kerak Bumi Di Jawa Bagian Tengah Berdasarkan Analisis Fungsi Penerima Teleseismik Menggunakan Inversi Algoritma Neighbourhood. Universitas Indonesia.

Ariyanto, P., Rosid, M. S., Syuhada, & Januarti, Y. (2018). A Comparison of Tele-Seismic Receiver Function in The Different Geological Units in Central Java. EAGE-HAGI 1st Asia Pacific Meeting on Near Surface Geoscience and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20

Ariyanto, P., Rosid, M. S., Syuhada, & Januarti, Y. (2021). Study of Crustal Structure Beneath Station Banjarnegara Indonesia (BJI) Based on Receiver Function Analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Bahri, S., Suryanto, W., & Ngadmanto, D. (2021). Sediment and Crustal Structure Beneath East Kalimantan and East Java, Indonesia from Receiver Function. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1825(1), 012014.

BMKG. (2019). Katalog Gempa Bumi Signifikan dan Merusak 1821-2018.

BMKG. (2021). Katalog Gempa Bumi. BMKG Data Archives. https://geof.bmkg.go.id/webdc3/

Chen, Y., & Niu, F. (2016). Joint Inversion of Receiver Functions and Surface Waves with Enhanced Preconditioning on Densely Distributed CNDSN Stations: Crustal and Upper Mantle Structure Beneath China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(2), 743–766. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jb012450

Herrmann, R. B. (2013). Computer Programs in Seismology: An Evolving Tool for Instruction and Research. Seismological Research Letters, 84(6), 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220110096

ISC. (2021). ISC Bulletin: Arrivals Search. http://www.isc.ac.uk/iscbulletin/search/arrivals/

Jarchow, C. M., & Thompson, G. A. (1989). The Nature of The Mohorovicic Discontinuity. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. Vol. 17, No. 1, 475–506.

Julià , J., Ammon, C. J., Herrmann, R. B., & Correig, A. M. (2000). Joint Inversion of Receiver Function and Surface Wave Dispersion Observations. Geophysical Journal International, 143(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00217.x.

Katili, J. A. (1975). Volcanism and Plate Tectonics in The Indonesian Island Arcs. Tectonophysics, 26(3–4), 165–188.

Kennett, B. L. N., Engdahl, E. R., & Buland., R. (1995). Constraints on Seismic Velocities in The Earth from Traveltimes. Journal International Geophysics, 122, 108–124.

Lay, T., & Wallace, T. C. (1995). Modern Global Seismology (International Geophysics Series, Volume 58). Academic Press.

LigorriÌa, J. P. (2000). An Investigation of The Mantle-Crust Transition Beneath North America and Poisson’s Ratio of The North American Crust. Saint Louis University.

Ligorría, J. P., & Ammon, C. J. (1999). Iterative Deconvolution and Receiver-Function Estimation. Bulletin of The Seismological Society of America, Vol. 89, No. 5, 1395–1400.

Martha, A. A., Cummins, P., Saygin, E., Widiyantoro, S., & Masturyono. (2017). Imaging of Upper Crustal Structure Beneath East Java–Bali, Indonesia with Ambient Noise Tomography. Geoscience Letters, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-017-0080-9

Menke, W. (1989). Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. Academic Press.

PUSGEN, T. P. S. G. N. (2017). Peta Sumber dan Bahaya Gempa Indonesia Tahun 2017.

PVMBG. (2021). MAGMA Indonesia. https://magma.vsi.esdm.go.id/#

Ryan, J. S., Beck, G., Zandt, L., Wagner, E., Minaya, H., & Tavera. (2016). Central Andean Crustal Structure from Receiver Function Analysis. Tectonophysics, 682, 120–133.

Smyth, H. (2005). East Java: Cenozoic Basins, Volcanoes and Ancient Basement. Indonesian Petroleum Association 30th Annual Convention Proceedings, Advance Access Published 2005.

Stein, S., & Wysession, M. (2005). An Introduction to Seismology, Earthquakes, and Earth Structure. Blackwell publishing: Victoria 3053.

Syuhada, D.H., N., I. A., C., T.P., N., A., T., & Y., T. (2016). Crustal Structure Along Sunda-Banda Arc Transition Zone from Teleseismic Receiver Functions. Acta Geophysica, 64(4), 2020–2050.

Van Bemmelen, R. W. (1949). The Geology of Indonesia (2nd ed.). General Geology of Indonesia and Adjacent Archipelagoes.

Wölbern, I., & Rümpker, G. (2016). Crustal Thickness Beneath Central and East Java (Indonesia) Inferred from P Receiver Functions. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences.

Xu, M., Huang, H., Huang, Z., Z., H., & Wang, L. (2016). SplitRFLab: A MATLAB GUI Toolbox for Receiver Function Analysis Based on SplitLab[J]. Earthquake Science, 29(1), 17–26.

Xu, Z. J., Song, X., & Zhu, L. (2013). Crustal and Uppermost Mantle S Velocity Structure Under Hi-CLIMB Seismic Array in Central Tibetan Plateau from Joint Inversion of Surface Wave Dispersion and Receiver Function Data. Tectonophysics, 584, 209–220.

Yu, Y., Song, J., Liu, K. H., & Gao, S. S. (2015). Determining Crustal Structure Beneath Seismic Stations Overlying a Low-Velocity Sedimentary Layer Using Receiver Functions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 120(5), 3208–3218.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-23

How to Cite

Ariyanto, P., Sidiqa, M., Pranata, B., & Prayitno, B. S. (2021). STRUKTUR KERAK BUMI DI JAWA TIMUR BERDASARKAN ANALISIS FUNGSI PENERIMA TELESEISMIK. JGE (Jurnal Geofisika Eksplorasi), 7(3), 202–225. https://doi.org/10.23960/jge.v7i3.168

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)