IDENTIFICATION OF ANDESITE ROCK BASED ON THE RESISTIVITY VALUE IN SATUI AREA, SOUTH KALIMANTAN

Authors

  • Sri Cahyo Wahyono Program Studi Fisika Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
  • Krisologus Genesa Atmadja Program Studi Fisika Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
  • Simon Sadok Siregar Program Studi Fisika Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23960/jge.v6i3.93

Keywords:

andesite rock, electricity method, Wenner configuration, Satui area

Abstract

Andesite rock identification has been carried out in Satui, South Kalimantan using the geoelectric method. Four lines resistivity measurement using Wenner configuration are used with a length of 200-350 m. The purpose of this study is to determine the depth, thickness and position of andesite rocks in the measurement area. Based on the results of processing there are three types of layers in the measurement area, clay with a resistivity of 9.760-68.373 Ωm, sandstones with a resistivity value of 68.373-324.509 Ωm and andesite with a resistivity ≥ 324.509 Ωm. The results of 2D interpretation show that the andesite rock in the entire first path are at a distance of 10.00-170.00 m, depth 6.76-9.94 m and thickness 7.36-10.54 m. Andesite in the second lane are found at a distance of 80-345 m, depth 1.25-9.94 m and thickness 2.62-10.54 m, on the third lane found at a distance of 100.00-200.00 m, depth 13.40 m and 3.90 m thick. Andesite in the fourth lane are found at a distance of 5.00-175.00 m with a depth of 6.76-13.40 m and thickness 1.95-10.54 m.

References

Amir, H., Akmam, Bavitra, & Azhari, M. (2017). Penentuan Kedalaman Batuan Dasar Menggunakan Metode Geolistrik Tahanan Jenis dengan Membandingkan Konfigurasi Dipole-Dipole dan Wenner di Bukit Apit Puhun Kecamatan Guguk Panjang Kota Bukittinggi. Jurnal Eksakta, 18(1), 19–30.

Cahyadi, T. A., & Sudiyanto, A. (2010). Pendugaan Bijih Besi Dengan Geolistrik Resistivity -2D dan Geomagnet di Daerah Sebayur, Desa Maroktuah, Kec. Singkep Barat, Kabupaten Lingga, Propinsi Kepulauan Riau. Prosiding Seminar Nasional ReTII 5.

Giamboro, W. S., & Hidayat, W. (2016). Pemodelan 3D Resistivitas Batuan Andesit Daerah Sangon, Kab. Kulonprogo, Provinsi DIY. Jurnal Ilmu Kebumian Teknologi Mineral, 2(1), 45=52.

Hakim, A. R., & Hairunisa, H. (2017). Studi Struktur Bawah Permukaan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Geolistrik Resistivitas Konfigurasi Schlumberger. Wacana Didaktika, 5(01), 50. https://doi.org/10.31102/wacanadidaktika.5.01.50-64

Herman, R. (2001). An introduction to electrical resistivity in geophysics. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 943–952. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1378013

Heryanto, R. S., Supriatna, E., Rustandi, & Baharuddin. (2007). Peta Geologi Lembar Banjarmasin, Kalimantan. Pusat Survei Geologi.

Husna, D. A., Wahyono, S. C., & Siregar, S. S. (2019). Identifikasi Liang Bawah Permukaan Berdasarkan Nilai Tahanan Jenis di Gua Batu Tunggal Desa Tegalrejo Kotabaru. Jurnal Fisika FLUX, 16(1), 48–53.

Jayadi, H., Meidji, I. U., & Tang, B. Y. (2019). Identifying Andesite Rocks Sources Using Geoelectrical Resistivity in Loli, Donggala Regency, Central Sulawesi. Journal of Physical Science and Engineering, 4(2), 45–54.

Juandi, M. (2009). Analisis Pencemaran Air tanah Berdasarkan Metode Geolistrik Studi Kasus Tempat Pembuagan Akhir Sampah Muara Fajar Kecamatan Rumbai Ground Water Pollution Analytical Based on Geo-electrical Methods Case on Muara Fajar Landfill Kecamatan Rumbai. Ilmu Lingkungan Journal of Environmenl Science, 2(3), 95–104.

Kementerian ESDM RI. (2017). Exploring Energy and Mineral Resources of Indonesia. ESDM One Map. https://geoportal.esdm.go.id/

Munaji, Imam, S., & Lutfinur, I. (2013). Penentuan Tahanan Jenis Batuan Andesit Menggunakan Metode Geolistrik Konfigurasi Schlumberger (Studi Kasus Desa Polosiri). Jurnal Fisika, 3(2), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.15294/jf.v3i2.3820

Panjaitan, S. (2010). Geologi Daerah Panas Bumi Ulubelu Tanggamus, Lampung Utara Berdasarkan Analisis Metode Magnetotellurik (Mt). Jurnal Geologi dan Sumberdaya Mineral, 20(2), 69–91.

Prastowo, R. (2017). Pemodelan 2D Resistivitas Batuan Andesit Daerah Gunung Kukusan, Kulon Progo. Jurnal Kurvatek, 2(2), 87–93.

Priyanti, D. D., Wahyono, S. C., & Siregar, S. S. (2014). Pendugaan Pencemaran Air Tanah Di Tempat Pembuangan Sampah Landasan Ulin Timur Dengan Metode Geolistrik Konfigurasi Schlumberger. Jurnal Fisika FLUX, 11(1), 68–77.

Purwasatriya, E. B. (2013). Studi Potensi Sumberdaya Andesit Menggunakan Metode Geolistrik Di Daerah Kokap, Kabupaten Kulonprogo, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Dinamika Rekayasa, 9(2), 54–60.

Sidiq, H., Santoso, A. B., & Prastowo, R. (2018). Penerapan Metode Kriging Pada Pemodelan Andesit Menggunakan Data Geolistrik Daerah Gunung Kali Songgo Kulon Progo Yogyakarta. Prosiding Nasional Rekayasa Teknologi Industri dan Informasi XIII Tahun 2018, 2018(November), 89–95.

Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., & Sheriff, R. E. (1990). Applied Geophysics. In Cambridge University Press (Second Edi). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367812614-1

Widyayanti, M., Wahyono, S. C., & Wianto, T. (2013). Analisa Potensi Kedalaman Batubesi dengan Metode Geolistrik 3d di Gunung Melati Kabupaten Tanah Laut. Jurnal Fisika FLUX, 10(3), 56–66.

Wightman, W. E., Jalinoos, F., Sirles, P., & Hanna, K. (2003). Application of Geophysical Methods to Highway Related Problems. In ntral Federal Lands Highway Division, Lakewood, CO, No. FHWA-IF-04-021.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-24

How to Cite

Wahyono, S. C., Atmadja, K. G., & Siregar, S. S. (2020). IDENTIFICATION OF ANDESITE ROCK BASED ON THE RESISTIVITY VALUE IN SATUI AREA, SOUTH KALIMANTAN. JGE (Jurnal Geofisika Eksplorasi), 6(3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.23960/jge.v6i3.93

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check